<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Buddy Shearer &#187; Keywords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://buddyshearer.com/category/keywords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://buddyshearer.com</link>
	<description>blogging for fun and money</description>
	<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Is there any reason to pursue long-tailed keyword phrases?</title>
		<link>http://buddyshearer.com/general/keywords/is-there-any-reason-to-pursue-long-tailed-keyword-phrases/</link>
		<comments>http://buddyshearer.com/general/keywords/is-there-any-reason-to-pursue-long-tailed-keyword-phrases/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 13:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buddy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Keywords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buddyshearer.com/?p=237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
I belong to a group of well-intended internet marketers and that debate still comes up now and again.  It appears that it is evenly split.  Half say that you should focus on a phrase that has decent traffic potential and just stay with it.
While the other half says the longer tailed phrases are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buddyshearer.com/general/keywords/is-there-any-reason-to-pursue-long-tailed-keyword-phrases/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shearer</title>
		<link>http://buddyshearer.com/general/keywords/shearer/</link>
		<comments>http://buddyshearer.com/general/keywords/shearer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buddy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Keywords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buddyshearer.com/?p=232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Simple title.
The reason is that I am throwing some SEO into the mix.  If you remember my goal is to attain the number one spot for &#8220;Buddy&#8221; and the number to beat was 110,000,000 other sites.  The last time i checked I was sitting at 562th postion out of 1,000 sites that Google [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buddyshearer.com/general/keywords/shearer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Keyword Buddy</title>
		<link>http://buddyshearer.com/general/keywords/keyword-buddy/</link>
		<comments>http://buddyshearer.com/general/keywords/keyword-buddy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 13:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Buddy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Keywords]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://buddyshearer.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
			
				
			
		
Is this post about some awesomely new keyword research tool?  Or is it about the absolute best keyword researcher on the planet?  Maybe it is about a revolutionary new tool that extrapolates keyword from competitor sites.
Honestly, it is not any of those.
This is about my adventures in tackling hard root level keywords.
What do [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://buddyshearer.com/general/keywords/keyword-buddy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

